Excited about AWP

Hello everyone. The big annual AWP conference is coming, and this year it’s coming to Chicago. “AWP” means “Association of Writing Programs,” and AWP is a big get-together of writers, teachers, and literary magazines over a three-day exhausamazingthon. Yes, you are allowed to use that word in Scrabble. At the end of February I’m flying to sunny, balmy Chicago, along with my friend Matt Blasi, to run the Story Quarterly table in the bookfair. If you are going, say hi. If you wanted to go but can’t, I’m really sorry (tickets sold out a few days ago, abruptly and unexpectedly).

The conference has three main draws:

1. The many panels, where four or five writers team up to give a short lecture on a particular topic. Click the link to see really how many there are. I’m especially looking forward to seeing Cathy Day speak about the teaching of novel writing, on Thursday lunch.

2. The bookfair. Here, writing programmes, literary magazines, independent publishers, strange book-related businesses spread their wares. You wander the aisles chatting to vendors about their goods, buy a suitcase’s worth of discounted magazines, or spot your hero sitting at her publisher’s table, eating a slice of cake. I saw Mary Gaitskell eating a slice of cake last year, and I ran up and gushed. She was kind.

3. Readings. Both in and outside the conference, established and not so established writers give readings and interviews. Last year I saw Gary Shteyngart and Amy Hempel give a joint reading, and the year before went to a bookshop reading by the amazing Robin Black.

Three tips for remaining sane:

1. Bring snacks. The conference’s food is so expensive even Romney would protest.

2. Take a weekend-long break from ambition and self-pity. AWP sold 9,500 tickets this year. That means that after you eliminate agents and publishers (say, 100 tickets), high school field trips (say, 1,000), magazine editors and employees (1,ooo), and crazy Margaret Atwood stalkers (c. 500), that still leaves 7,100 people milling nearby who want to be writers. Is there really room for seven thousand more Hemingways? A little voice will whisper, “It’s you or them. Kill them all.” Ignore this voice, smile, and sip a little more of your five dollar mineral water.

3. Take breaks. Get fresh air regularly, leave panels as soon as questions begin (the answers are rarely worth the twenty-minutes of downtime you gain before the next hour’s panels start), and see something of the city that isn’t AWP. Chicago sounds excellent for that. I am looking to explore a little wildly.

The beginnings of a drinking game (I will add more rules as they come to me. Suggest more in the comments, and I will add them.) Carry a flask of something strong, and drink when:

1. You ask a literary magazine, “What kind of stories would you say you are looking for?” and they reply, dully, vacantly, “We like all kinds of stories.”

2. You ask a tiny independent press, who makes beautiful tiny books, “So, how do you promote these books? How do you market them?” and they merely blink a few times in response, wide-eyed and silent, like the final flaps of a dying butterfly’s wings.

3. You spot someone respected and important in the booth for a writing programme you have always been interested in, yet cannot speak to him because a young man is hogging him, droning on in a vacuous urge to impress, or in a failed attempt to obscure the essential vacuum within. “Yeah, I just love a community, and, like, since I stopped my undergrad, it’s just been so hard to write, so I’m really glad I could tell you about my earlier teacher, who always told me…”

Drink. Three for now. More to come.

Best wishes.

Daniel

1 Comment

Filed under MFA, On writing, Teaching

Unimportant Definitions of Indolence

I feel not so much lazy these days, as indolent. I am getting things done–I completed my last PhD application, my ninth, last week, I have found an excellent replacement for myself in my apartment, and he is excited about moving in, and I am sorting out my trip to the AWP conference–and listing all this makes me annoyed at myself, as if I need to prove my own value to someone, as if my days are owned by this other person, and I buy them back through toil. I resent the feeling but would also resent not feeling it.

Something definitely feels off. Since Christmas I have only felt truly creative in brief spurts, and I am left wondering when this indolence will end. 

It contains these feelings:
A difficulty to concentrate for long. 
A fascination with receiving email. 
A memory of a great momentum felt during November and December, a together-ness of much simultaneous action, a sensation now lost. 
Of having reached a plateau, and unsure where the next path up is to be found. 

Obviously, there are good reasons for all these. PhD programmes begin reporting back in February, and I am probably more nervous than I know. And much of my output back at the end of 2011 may have come through a pushing away of concerns that now must be answered, especially as my practical life is imminently disintegrating. 

I think of Keats, and his indolence ode, the rejoicing in it. And I am resting, savouring the city, the winter sun. Still, I am curious how long this phase will last. 

Best wishes to you all.

Daniel

6 Comments

Filed under diary

Back from the Getaway

I got back from the Winter Getaway late Monday. It was a great weekend.

I arrived on Friday knowing almost no one, and I felt a little awkward in the crowd of tables, especially as returning participants were greeting each other all around me. I had never been to a writing conference before; the closest thing I had experienced was the (giant) annual AWP conference, which has always left me bewildered and self-doubting. Fortunately, Peter and Amanda, the Getaway’s organisers, have created a space that is powerfully welcoming, and I got to know more and more people each day I was at the Seaview hotel, a process that began almost as soon as Friday night orientation began. We all headed around the ballroom clutching a playing card, looking for partners, and I was lucky that a couple of the scholarship judges recognised my name-badge, and introduced me to their circle.

I met many people quickly, talked, drank, watched the disco from a distance. I shared a room with a remarkable poet, Rocky, who carried around a toy monkey, and sometimes wore a jester’s hat.

Saturday morning I woke too late for yoga, but in time for breakfast, and then went to my class with Richard Weems. The ten of us in the class had a writing prompt (show two people trying to achieve a tangible goal, the frustrations of which reveal something deeper about their relationship). At ten a.m. we were released to write, and I tap-tap-typed a short story during the two and a half hours we were given. Then we met in the afternoon to share and discuss each piece. Class ended, there was a little time free, then the author of Boardwalk Empire gave a speech on researching and publishing his book, the source of the now famous HBO series. I had heard vague stories that once the book had been published, Martin Scorsese had simply read it, called, and the rights had been bought. This was revealed as a pleasant fantasy: Nelson Johnson spent twenty years researching and writing the book, then struggled over and over to get it published, and then, once it was published, laboured again and again to interest Hollywood in Nucky Johnson’s story, which made up the book’s middle chapters. The truth was not surprising. So much of this is perspiration.

I went out with new friends for dinner and drank much wine. The following morning I missed yoga again. The prompt for Sunday was to write a story using only imperatives, instructing the reader in something, as well as to include a recipe and recommend two acts that you (the writer) find morally abhorrent. Classmates produced some great pieces: “How to Become Invisible,” or “How to Make Love to a Werewolf.” Mine was “How to Pass among Mortals.” I read it at the late night open mic.

On Sunday evening, the four scholarship winners were presented with their awards (I have already posted mine back to my parents, as a tiny gesture of thanks for all their support), and after that ceremony lots of people wanted to talk to me and offer congratulations. The Winter Getaway is a very encouraging place, where people unaffectedly say nice things. In a corridor on Monday morning, one older gentleman told me congratulations for the scholarship, and asked how long I had been writing. I said eight years. He nodded, then said,

“For me, I have a wife, children, a home. I’m happy. I hope you can get those things too.”

I was reminded of Yeats’s old dilemma:

The intellect of man is forced to choose
perfection of the life, or of the work,
And if it take the second must refuse
A heavenly mansion, raging in the dark.

I hoped that the stranger and not Yeats would be correct.

After the scholarship presentations, the poet Stephen Dunn got up to read. If you haven’t heard Dunn’s poetry, you seize any chance you get. He is the real thing. He manages to write poems about everyday life in New Jersey (he was and is a teacher at Stockton College) in seemingly simple free verse, which yet contain enormously powerful insights and arguments. I was on the verge of crying out a request for the poem “Here and Now,” but he soon read it anyway, the poem he called “a better love song” to his wife Barbara. Downstairs in the hotel, there was an exhibit dedicated to Dunn, showing his drafting process of several poems, including this one, and I had already seen Dunn’s handwriting re-work this poem, paring down the final lines until there was nothing excess. The whole poem is here: here is the second half, each verse growing in certainty and power:

…Electricity may start things,
but if they’re to last
I’ve come to understand
a steady, low-voltage hum

of affection
must be arrived at. How else to offset
the occasional slide
into neglect and ill temper?
I learned, in time, to let heaven
go its mythy way, to never again

be a supplicant
of any single idea. For you and me
it’s here and now from here on in.
Nothing can save us, nor do we wish
to be saved.

Let night come
with its austere grandeur,
ancient superstitions and fears.
It can do us no harm.
We’ll put some music on,
open the curtains, let things darken
as they will.

11 Comments

Filed under Fiction, On writing, Poetry, Reviews, Teaching

Getaway

Hello everyone. Have a lovely weekend. I’m heading off to the Winter Getaway writing conference, and I’ll be back in Philadelphia early next week. Best wishes to you all.

Hmmm. Do you ever have one of those mornings where you wake both extremely hungry and aware that you have nothing in the house suitable for breakfast? That’s me right now. I will go attempt to survive.

Best wishes again,

Daniel

Leave a Comment

Filed under On Pine Street, On writing

Why you should be nice to foreigners, part two (Will McNiece)

This is the second part of an essay on cultural differences and prejudices by Will McNiece. The first part is here.

Why You Should Be Nice to Foreigners (part two)

When I moved to Germany, I encountered two problems: the first was the bureaucracy, which was complicated but well ordered; and the second was my psychopathic housemate. The first problem I overcame in a matter of weeks, simply by hanging around at various bureaucratic offices and allowing myself to be pushed back and forth until somebody who could speak English had time to speak to me. The second problem was a little more complicated, and required me to tip-toe around the apartment for three months before secretly moving all my stuff to a friend’s place and running away, foregoing the €500 ($670) deposit and changing my phone number.

The next four years were rocky and difficult, but greatly rewarding. I had moved to Berlin as a theatre set designer, and after three months of working full-time, being highly praised for my work and yet receiving no money, I realised it was time for a change of job. I became an English teacher. In Berlin, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of English teachers. Most of them stay for a few months and move on to another city, and few of them are qualified to teach English. I was among the category of the unqualified. Nevertheless, the most important quality required of an English teacher in Berlin is to be able to hold an hour-and-a-half long conversation with the same person week after week, and that was something I could do.

Working as an English teacher, I spent twenty hours each week talking to people from all over the world, learning about their cultures and their attitudes and their beliefs, and I came to understand that foreigners and immigrants are among the most important groups of people in the world.

What I noticed about the various people I met was that they all held the same set of core values: they all wanted to live in comfort and safety and they all wanted their children to have better lives than they did. These values cut through all other values, whether that person was pro-American or anti-American, whether that person was a capitalist or a socialist, whether that person was a conservative or a liberal, whether that person was open-minded or whether that person hated immigrants.

Another thing I noticed is that people have two aspects to their selves. There is the personal aspect, which displays a great deal of empathy towards other humans, and the societal aspect, which is ruthless and callous. Consider this scenario: you are face-to-face with a man on Death Row who killed a child and is about to be executed. He pleads for his life and you see from his pleas that he is repentant for what he did. The personal side of you will most likely empathise with him, to an extent. You will probably not grant him his freedom, but you might grant him his life. The societal side of you is colder. The law is the law and it must be upheld. If you do not execute him, other killers may take advantage of your softness.

Returning to the Afrikaners – when they were aloof toward my parents, it was only a societal response, not a personal one. In that context, the response was understandable. Societies outlast individuals, and the British society that committed the atrocities against the Boers is the same society that my parents come from. The personal response never got a chance to come out, because when dealing with something unfamiliar, it’s safer to deal with it from a cold perspective.

In my English classes, I often initiated discussions like the Death Row Killer, and what I learnt was that people were generally ruthless in their views until I was able to give them a personal perspective (perhaps the killer was their son or daughter, for example). Then they softened up and saw the dual standards by which they lived. I’m not saying that people are hypocritical, though many are. I’m saying that we all live our lives by two sets of standards, and if we are to improve ourselves, we need to be able to learn which set of standards is appropriate for which circumstance. Blaming a civil engineer and his wife for an eighty year old massacre is the wrong response. Similarly, accepting an invading army into your home on the basis that they are nice people once you get to know them is equally wrong.

Most people never see their own dual standards, but living around foreigners and immigrants and interacting with them on a day-to-day basis gives people a better chance. Immigrants are often vilified in the media by politicians (probably because they have few voting rights and are not a significant threat to the politicians’ careers). They brand immigrants as lazy and uneducated, uncultured and dishonest, and their sole purpose in life is to come to your country and take as much of its resources as possible. Many people believe what they are told, and without being forced to interact with people who are not their own, there is little hope of changing their minds.

When you are a foreigner, you don’t see things the same way as the locals. While the locals might see you as a person come to exploit them, as a foreigner, you see the country as a place of opportunity, a place where you can make more of yourself than if you had stayed at home. You don’t see the locals as suckers to be exploited, and you don’t bad mouth the country you are staying in. You work hard, because you have to, otherwise you get kicked out of the country, and you do your best to learn the local culture and language. Of course, not all foreigners do that, but most of the ones I’ve met do.

I can tell you that learning a new culture is difficult. I spent four years learning German and trying to adopt the German way of life, and I discovered that there were some aspects that I liked, and some that I didn’t. I like how Germans treat people with respect, but I don’t like how they refuse to talk to strangers. I also learnt that while my German friends fully accept me, the German society will never see me as anything but a foreigner as long as I live. In fact, only recently has the German society started to accept second generation immigrants as German. Being born in Germany and growing up in the German society did not always mean you could claim to be German if your parents came from somewhere else.

Now I live in Poland. I have not had much experience yet with the Polish culture and the Polish way of life, but I have spoken to several Poles who, when they discovered I used to live in Germany, expressed their distaste for Germans and their country. Their opinions largely come from the Second World War and their grandparents, who, admittedly, the Germans did their best to wipe off the face of the earth. Those opinions come from the societal aspect of a person, and only reflect half of a healthy human mind. To properly nurture the personal aspect would require contact with a German, and then another, and another until a broad range of Germans have been sampled.

It’s not enough to meet a person from another culture once, whether your experience is good or bad. One person does not and cannot represent his or her entire culture. Once, when I was speaking with a man in a hostel, we started talking about the Australians who were also staying there. He mentioned that he didn’t mind Australians, but he hated New Zealanders. Surprised, I asked him why. “Because they’re assholes,” he said. I asked him how he knew that and he replied, “I once had a roommate who was from New Zealand, and he was an asshole.”

There are many things in Poland similar to what I have experienced before, and many things that are different. Polish bureaucracy makes German bureaucracy look easy, although the Polish bureaucrats are much friendlier. I like how Poles talk to strangers in the street, and the fact that you don’t speak Polish does not stop them from talking to you, albeit in Polish. I missed that aspect of life when I was in Germany. I don’t like how insane the drivers in Poland are: they are the second worst drivers I have ever seen (the worst being in Serbia, where I witnessed three car crashes in two days). Leaving the apartment means that your probability of living to see the next day is greatly reduced. I don’t like how chaotic life can be here, but at the same time I do. The UK, Ireland and Germany are all very established, especially Germany, where people don’t even jaywalk, but Poland still has a Wild West flavour to it. When you step out of the front door, you have the feeling that anything could happen.

There is now a large number of Poles in Northern Ireland (we call them “Polacks”), and hopefully they can show the people of Northern Ireland that, while different cultures think and act differently, those cultures are no less valid than the homegrown culture. But it’s too early to tell. Of course, the Poles, just like everybody else, travel with their own bigotry and prejudices, and perhaps the people of Northern Ireland can help them out. Being nice to foreigners is necessary because the exposure to foreign cultures highlights the flaws and strengths in our own culture. Being nice to foreigners is not a selfless act. Interacting with people who are not our own is initially difficult and frustrating and a little frightening. Then again everything that is worthwhile is initially difficult and frustrating and a little frightening. But if we continue to interact with people who are not our own, it becomes easier, we get better at it, and we grow as people. A Polish girl and I took the time to be nice to each other, and now we are in love and we live together. We have differences that sometimes frustrate us: I don’t understand why she has to do things her way when my way is obviously better, and she doesn’t understand why I have to do things my way, although it’s obviously better. But there are differences in every relationship, not just ours. I don’t know how long our relationship will last, but I believe our decision to embrace foreign cultures has made us more sensitive to each others’ needs, and I think that gives us a better chance than most. And I do know that we wouldn’t be together now if we hadn’t taken a risk and made that which was foreign a part of our own lives.

 

You can talk to Will in the comments below, or visit his blog, here. Let me know if you would like to guest write on this blog, too.

Best wishes.

2 Comments

Filed under Guest Post, World